Showing posts with label amnesty international. Show all posts
Showing posts with label amnesty international. Show all posts

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Amnesty to engage Pacific media in campaign against poverty

By Josephine Latu: Pacific Media Watch

Amnesty International is gearing up to launch a “demand dignity” campaign with a focus on human rights and poverty in the Pacific region.

The dignity campaign is a global project to promote social and economic human rights, focusing on poverty issues.

The role of the media in this campaign has been highlighted at a special seminar hosted by the School of Communications at AUT University, labelled “Putting human rights at the heart of Pacific journalism”.

Amnesty's deputy director in New Zealand, Rebecca Emery, said: “We find that the understanding of human rights among the media and the New Zealand general public is probably not as well understood as it should be."

The organisation is seeking to develop a “new media network” to bring more awareness about human rights issues in the region.

Emery added that Amnesty was expanding its focus from civil and political rights, to social and economic rights, and that development in the Pacific was seen “a rights issue”.

“We will be looking at the slums in the Pacific – first up, Fiji, then the Solomons and Vanuatu,” she said.

TVNZ’s Pacific affairs correspondent Barbara Dreaver also pointed to poverty as the “biggest issue in the Pacific”.

She gave the example of Kiribati, where “prostitution [of young women] to foreign fisherman, sometimes encouraged by their families”, was a reality of the struggle for survival.

Dreaver also spoke about human rights in the Fiji and her own experiences.

‘Fearless reporting’
She added that “fearless” reporting was needed to bring attention to human rights abuses that communities may prefer to keep hidden.

However, she said journalists needed to report on solutions as well as the problem.

Pacific Cooperation Foundation programme coordinator David Vaeafe said that in a survey conducted at the Pacific Islands News Association (PINA) conference in the Solomons in 2007, Pacific journalists identified three main human rights themes as priorities:

• governance, leadership and freedom of expression;

• environmental rights;

• and children’s rights.

He announced that the Pacific Cooperation Foundation was currently working with the New Zealand Human Rights Commission on a learning website for environmental rights reporting, due to launch in at the PINA conference in Vanuatu in mid-July.

The site will include online tutorials, training modules, documents about freedom of information laws, and Pacific country profiles.

“It will be a live working site that will be updated constantly,” he said.

“It’s accessible to everyone and people can go through the training modules at their own pace.”

The modules were written by four journalists from the Pacific and New Zealand, and covered print, radio, television and online reporting.

Picture: Fiji soldiers keeping the press at bay (Radio Fiji).

Josephine Latu is a masters student in the School of Communication Studies and also contributing editor of the Pacific Media Centre's Pacific Media Watch database.

Amnesty International NZ Pacific Media Watch on Pacific media and human rights

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Solomon Islands launches 'commission of hope'

A legacy of bitterness still troubles the Weathercoast (south coast of Guadalcanal) and parts of Malaita in the Solomon Islands. It has been five years since the conflict and now hopes are pinned on a new commission to consolidate peace.

By Krista Ferguson: Pacific Media Centre


High hopes for a long lasting peace are resting on the South Pacific’s first Truth and Reconciliation Commission, launched by Archbishop Desmond Tutu in the Solomon Islands late last month.

The commission has been mandated to promote national unity and reconciliation by investigating human rights violations and abuses which occurred between 1998 and 2003.

General secretary of the Anglican Church of Melanesia, George Kiriau, is personally hopeful that the reconciliation process will be successful.

“There is a lot of expectation given the high note of the presence of the archbishop.

“With this launch we should see better understanding of how the conflict came about.

“I’m personally very hopeful and optimistic.”

However, Kiriau acknowledges that there are people who might not share this optimism.

“There are those who are hurt and traumatised, who had relatives who were killed. They may have different views of the process.”

But healing is important says Kiriau.

“We need to forgive.”

Little consultation
Dolores Devesi, Pacific programme manager for Oxfam, says her organisation supports the request by the national government for reconciliation.

But Devesi, who was born in the Solomon Islands and came to New Zealand in October last year, says her personal view is that this is the same as every other time.

The problem, according to Devesi, is that young people in the community are not consulted and engaged in the process.

“It’s usually the chiefs and elders, but it is actually the young people who need to be involved.

Devesi says there are some sceptics who say this is a high-level publicity exercise that will cost a lot of money.

There have been attempts to establish peace in the past, such as the Townsville Peace Agreement in 2000.

Devesi attended a reconciliation event last year and was not impressed.

“It was superficial. There was one woman and no young people. The elders attended and presented gifts to each other.”

Devesi says that there is always hope at the beginning of each process. But there is also a feeling of “here we go again”.

“We’ve had too many that haven’t worked. There’s always hope at first, but as the days and months drag on, hope disappears.

“It will take a long time to heal. There is a lot of hatred.”

Sorting out
For Kiriau, the people involved in the process are also the key.

“You can have the good reforms, but if the people inside are not sorted out then you can’t make much progress. People will find a way around the system.”

Kiriau says the commission has people of integrity and this will help people be more forthcoming.

The team includes three national commissioners: Rev Sam Ata, George Kejoa and Caroline Laore and two others - Ratu Joni Madraiwiwi from Fiji and Sofia Macher from Peru.

There is a lot of bad feeling still, says Kiriau.

“It is still a fragile law and order situation. The leaders will need to be careful.”

The Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Island (RAMSI) will help to underpin law and order during this process, says Kiriau.

Simplistic label
The conflict in the Solomon Islands is often labelled as ethnic-based, but Kiriau says this is too simple.

“It is to do with development and economic opportunities.”

The government is struggling to provide basic services. There is a high population growth and many people are dropping out or leaving education and not finding jobs, says Kiriau.

Devesi also says that the underlying issues need to be addressed.

The biggest problem is the land issue, she says.

“The government needs to be proactive to prevent another blowout especially in the temporary land settlements outside Honiara.”

Urban migration and economic pressures are also a problem, she says.

“How do we retain people in the villages?

“The cost of food is extremely high. You can’t save any money.”

Devesi says she monitored her budget in 2007 and 99 percent of it went on basic food items even though she was on an above average salary.

Sweeping term
Dr Jon Fraenkel, a Melanesian programme senior research fellow at the Australian National University (ANU), says ethnicity is a very sweeping term, but at certain times in history, island-wide groups have emerged that were deeply antagonistic.

He named the Isatabu Freedom Movement (IFM) formed by Guales and the Malaita Eagle Force (MEF), formed by Malaitans (two different provinces), as examples.

“The conflicts started in 1998 with a speech by Ezekiel Alebua in Western Guadalcanal. He demanded compensation for the killing of 25 Guales and for establishing the capital in Guadalcanal.

“The IFM chased Malaitan settlers out of rural parts of Guadalcanal. They pushed them back into the capital Honiara.”

The Malaitans didn’t think their rights to the land were secure, he says, so they moved without strong dissent at first.

However, there was increasing discontent until 1999 when Malaitans confronted the then Prime Minister Bartholomew Ulufa’alu and demanded compensation for lost property.

Ulufa’alu said no and soon after the MEF was formed.

“It was steadily downhill after then,” says Dr Fraenkel.

Court evidence
Amnesty International has urged the Solomon Islands government to integrate the work of the truth commission with other justice work.

According to a statement on April 29, the Truth and Reconciliation Act may prevent information presented before the commission being used in court proceedings.

Kiriau says the government has been clear that the statements made before the commission cannot be used as court evidence.

However, he says that this is about sharing experiences and helping the government to prevent this unrest in future.

Dr Fraenkel says the community is still deeply divided by the conflict.

“There are terribly bitter wounds on the Weathercoast (south coast of Guadalcanal), but also parts of Malaita.”

Dr Fraenkel says that it has been five years since the conflict and most - but not all - of the militants have been arrested.

“The major issue is not finding more militants to prosecute. It’s allowing the country to move onwards.”

However, he does say there are some of the MEF leadership with questions to answer.

“It’s important to get the politics right to enable the emergence of a domestic leadership to deal with issues and get some economic development going.”

Devesi says nobody should be above the laws.

“Everyone would like to see prosecutions.”

Compensation culture
Dr Fraenkel says that the conflicts were fuelled by the compensation culture through which rival militia groups bankrupted the state.

He describes this in his 2004 book The Manipulation of Custom; From Uprising to Intervention in the Solomon Islands.

Traditionally compensation payments were made with pigs, cans of tuna, rice or shell money, says Dr Fraenkel. However, during the 1998–2003 conflicts many aggrieved groups demanded compensation from the state.

Devesi agrees with Fraenkel that money has been part of the problem.

“In our tradition you give pigs or shell money," she says.

“Reconciliation in the past has been sponsored by donor agencies [involving
money]. Reconciliation will only happen if the community gives from their
heart.”

Krista Ferguson is a Graduate Diploma in Journalism on the AUT Asia-Pacific Journalism course. Photo of Dolores Devesi: Oxfam.

Amnesty International statement

Monday, May 4, 2009

Amnesty boosts Pacific human rights campaign

Pacific Media Centre

Amnesty International’s New Zealand section is stepping up a new strategy focused on grave abuses of human rights in the Pacific.

And Fiji has emerged as the major target at the organisation’s national annual general meeting at AUT University this weekend.

“Demanding dignity gives Amnesty International members an unparalleled opportunity to be regionally relevant,” chief executive Patrick Holmes told delegates.

“Grave and growing human rights abuses in the Pacific region are a big concern.

“We will work to ensure dedicated human rights laws in the Pacific are on the radar.”

Amnesty’s Pacific researcher Apolosi Bose, who last month spent two weeks in Fiji on a fact-finding mission, said in a report that the regime could commit further human rights abuses now it had almost unlimited power.

He said people who were critics of the government were afraid to speak out because there was no constitution, no judiciary and the media had been censored.

Holmes said Amnesty International would work towards developing strong partnerships with local human rights groups in Pacific nations.

“Human rights is the only way to human dignity,” he said.

The organisation’s strategic plan for the next two years said the two main objectives were to focus on:

• Grave abuses of human rights in the Pacific, including New Zealand.

• Understanding and contributing to a “footprint in the Pacific”.

One of the two keynote speakers, Sacha McMeeking, law lecturer at the University of Canterbury and a member of Te Hunga Roia Māori (Māori Law Society), spoke of the “antipodean dream” and a wide belief that New Zealand had an exemplary human rights record.

“But embodying the dream means giving effect to the law,” she said. “Having an international human rights role means taking responsibility to step up and show by example.”

The 1840 Treaty of Waitangi had been a legal attempt to embody the dream by articulating rights and responsibilities on both sides.

The 1975 Waitangi Tribunal had been set up to drive things forward.

But the tribunal was only an advisory body and as it had no judicial powers, governments could ignore recommendations.

McMeeking said a challenge for these times was for New Zealand to develop a legal system that balanced protecting Māori human rights and the cultural right to survive as a people while protecting the rights of other New Zealanders.

Fiji human rights lawyer and women’s advocate Imrana Jalal spoke about the need for a regional human rights commission or agency as many smaller Pacific countries could not establish a sustainable national commission.

Picture: Governance board member Tuwhakairiora Williams, Fiji civil rights lawyer Imrana Jalal and Amnesty International Aotearoa's chief executive Patrick Holmes. Photo: Del Abcede.

Amnesty International Aotearoa New Zealand